CONVENTION of STATES

BECOME a MEMBER-PARTICIPANT of CONVENTION of STATES here. Get into the Action; Get information. Join here.

The article below, posted on Daily Signal, asserts that the Democrat Party (Socialists & Progressives) with Comrade Dear Leader Lizzy (Pocahontas or Fauxcahontas) Warren fear the Constitution like Dracula (blood-sucking vampire) fears sunshine or garlic. History is replete with obvious examples of Democrat behavior demonstrating their opposition to the Constitution, its framework for self-government, and its protection against potential government infringement of rights. Most all infringement of rights can be shown to have been instigated or executed by elected or employed Democrat operatives. Democrats oppose Free Speech unless favorable to them and gun ownership except by government. We the People have experienced unlawful searches and seizures most notably as a condition for boarding a commercial aircraft and secretly via FISA warrants or just unlawful searches by law enforcement. The right to Due Process and the right against Self-Incrimination have always been a joke."Plead to a lesser crime, and you won't risk conviction on a crime that could mean life in prison.", says our legal reps. This denies Due Process—a jury trial which could lead to acquittal (if you have a competent counselor) is denied.

Editor's Note: In regards to Lizzy Warren, I recommend an article by Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) with my preface, that exposes "Pocahontas" (Fauxcahontas) for what she is, a political hack that desires the complete domination of We the People by government. I think she is a Sociopath influenced and supported by a terrorist organization (watch "The Enemies Within" - link below). Emphasis Added below.

Recommendations

I recommend two (2) movies for interested viewers. If Democrat voters (or any voter) want to understand what is wrong with their party, I recommend a documentary movie that contains a completely corroborated history of the Democrat Party. The documentary's title is: Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party. The documentary was produced by Dinesh D'Souza who was 'railroaded' by the Obama Administration into a kangaroo court controlled by a corrupt judge and sentenced to prison for producing another documentary, 2016: Obama's America. All FACTS presented in these documentaries are the historical evidence of the failure of the Democrat Party although the Democrats have many allies that support these Communist/Socialist attempts to destroy America, and no group of FAKE NEWS companies can deny the FACTS.

Professor Carol Swain, Poli. Sci. & Law, Vanderbilt U. for Prager University Professor Swain appears in one segment of Dinesh D'Souza's aforementioned video.

While America has a Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech, it doesn't guarantee an everyday political education. If Americans believe in their freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, if Americans believe that Capitalism is the greatest creator of individual wealth the world has ever experienced (historical facts prove this assertion), then Americans should know the people and organizations who want to destroy America from within. Therefore, the best documentary available that exposes and identifies these enemies who have grown much stronger since the Russian Revolution is The Enemies Within.

Also near the end of The Enemies Within documentary, the video requests that citizens call their Senators and Representatives (those NOT affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and other subversive Marxist organizations) to support S. 68: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017 and H.R. 377: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017. After watching the video, you will clearly understand why the Muslim Brotherhood is trying to destroy America from within. Many current Representatives and Senators are affiliated with persons and organizations whose precepts, behavior, and speech are as Marxist as Vladimir Lenin without identifying themselves as Marxist. One of these organizations has infiltrated America like a final stage cancer. These un-American organizations must be excised like a massive tumor. This is NOT McCarthyism since you will SEE and UNDERSTAND the evidence presented in the video.

"The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history."
—George Orwell

FROM Democrats Don�t Fear Brett Kavanaugh. They Fear the Constitution. by David Harsanyi @davidharsanyi July 13, 2018 CAGW Names Sen. Elizabeth Warren March 2018 Porker of the Month Sure, some of the anger aimed at President Donald Trump�s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court is partisan bluster meant to placate the activist base. Still, most Democrats were going to get hysterical about any pick, because any conservative pick was going to take the Constitution far too literally for their liking. For those who rely on the administrative state and coercion as a policy tool�forcing people to join political organizations, forcing them to support abortion, forcing them to subsidize socially progressive sacraments, forcing them to create products that undermine their faith, and so on�that�s a big problem. Some, such as former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, indulged in the histrionic rhetoric we�ve come to expect in the Trump era, claiming that Kavanaugh would �threaten the lives of millions of Americans for decades to come.� But almost none of the objections coming from leading Democrats have been even ostensibly about Kavanaugh�s qualifications as a jurist or, for that matter, his interpretation of the Constitution. �Specifically,� prospective presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., argued, �as a replacement for Justice Anthony Kennedy, his nomination presents an existential threat to the health care of hundreds of millions of Americans.� Surely, the former attorney general of California comprehends that �health care� is not a constitutional right but rather a policy concern whose contours are still being debated by lawmakers�and probably will be for decades. What Harris probably meant is that Kavanaugh is an existential threat to the practice of forcing Americans to buy products in the private marketplace against their will. Kavanaugh, incidentally, upheld Obamacare as an appellate judge for jurisdictional reasons even though it displeased him on policy grounds. (He wrote that the law is without �principled limit.�) He did this because he has far more reverence for the law than Harris does. Leading presidential contender Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., whose collectivist doctrine clashes directly with the Constitution�s goal of restraining the state and empowering the individual, worries about �workers� rights, health care, climate change, environmental protection, and gun safety.� He should. Kavanaugh, with Justice Neil Gorsuch, is a critic of Chevron deference, the practice that allows administrative agencies to ignore their legal charge and have free rein to interpret statutory authority in virtually any way they please. Few things undermine the socialist agenda more than limiting our regulatory agencies� ability to lord over the economic decisions of Americans. [Editor's Note: "Practically unlimited discretionary power is vested in government agencies the decisions of which are expempt from judicial review." - Ludwig von Mises There is an inherent tendency in all governmental power to recognize no restraints on its operation and to extend the sphere of its dominion as much as possible. To control everything, to leave no room for anything to happen of its own accord without the interference of the authorities--this is the goal for which every ruler secretly strives. - Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism, p.67 ] Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, another potential presidential hopeful, said Kavanaugh �can�t be trusted to safeguard rights for women, workers, or to end the flow of corporate money to campaigns.� To �safeguard� the rights of women means keeping abortion legal on the federal level, without any genuine restrictions. For Gillibrand and others, invented rights are sacramental, whereas other precedents, such as stopping the �flow of corporate money��which is to say, the right of free expression codified by the Citizens United decision�should be conveniently discarded. There is absolutely no guiding principle to any of this other than political preference. It seems to me that with another originalist justice, we inch closer to a time when the majority of the left will simply dismiss the court as an antiquated impediment to progress. We already see this happening�not only from progressives but from supposed moderates. It�s why flip-flopping partisans such as Ezra Klein are now lamenting the �anti-democratic� position of the court. By �anti-democratic,� he doesn�t mean the court legalized abortion or same-sex marriage without the consent of states; he means it has recently stopped the federal government from compelling individuals to act in ways he and many others approve of. Normalizing the idea that the Constitution should be subservient to the fleeting will of politics and progressive conceptions of �justice� goes back to President Barack Obama, who promised in 2008 to nominate justices sharing �one�s deepest values, one�s core concerns, one�s broader perspectives on how the world works, and the depth and breadth of one�s empathy.� [Editor's Note: Contrary to the viewpoint of Democrats, Progressives, and Moderates, the U.S. governmnet is not a democracy except when electing a President, Vice President, Representatives, and Senators. The U.S. is a Constitutional Republic where elected people chosen from We the People "represent" us in CONgress. The President (with Agencies) enforces laws passed by CONgress with their interpretation of how the law will be enforced (regulations). This regulatory Executive with its Agencies (totaling 430 agencies) is the true problem with the federal government as it is today. Elected people are reelected or not, resulting in a leadership change. Agency employees remain behind with their political opinions and attitudes. This authoritative force is the actual ruler of our country generating and enforcing regulations anyway they want without constraint except for CONgressional Gullibilty when Oversight Committees hear testimony (lies) and read bogus reports full of lies and exaggeration. Strictly speaking, independent Agencies are nowhere mentioned in the Constitution's framework for the CONgress or Executive. Yet, the CONgress have created 430 of them that infiltrate American life daily forcing citizens and companies to do as they're told. CONgress has the Power to make all laws, but the creation of many boondoggle agencies to carry out their Powers is neither 'Necessary' nor 'Proper' (ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 18). ] The left hailed this position as proof of a thoughtful and moral temperament, when in reality it�s an ideological position that allows judges to arbitrarily create law and subordinate their constitutional duty to their personal worldview. Of course, there are a number of legitimate debates about how we should interpret the Constitution. And all justices aren�t political on all issues. Nor are all conservatives pure. But it�s the left that now embraces relativistic arguments about the intent and purpose of the Constitution. I wish the Supreme Court were less important. But right now, it�s one of the only institutions preserving constitutional order. And that�s why the left is about to go nuts again. FROM Why even Republicans embrace socialism September 24, 2018 by Bob Livingston Freedom is a black-or-white, yes-or-no, either/or, zero-sum proposition. There are no gray areas or lukewarmness when it comes to freedom. But the concept of freedom of the individual, or individual liberty, has been shoved down the memory hole and replaced by a popular mentality of diminishing the individual and independent thinker to a collectivist mind (mentality) which can be esoterically swayed, directed and channeled against his own best interest. The virtue and sanctity of the individual person and ego is no more, and anathema to the state. What does it all mean? It means that a state of mind is developed and nurtured that freely gives oneself and one�s production to the state. Each individual, in order to be a good citizen of the state, must contribute most of his means and be grateful for the services the state returns — whether they are necessary or useful or not. The result is that even so-called conservatives have come to not only accept socialism but to embrace it in many forms. Oh, they�ll reject it when it�s called what it is, as conservatives have chimed in to reject and ridicule proposals by self-avowed socialists like Bernie Sanders and the new communist darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. But they readily accept socialism in its many forms, especially when it�s proposed by socialists masquerading as Republicans.

FROM The Crux A new Congress has been seated, and it brings the prospect of perhaps, maybe, potentially, in a possible way doing something about the runaway federal deficits. And in other news, several New York area bridges are for sale, which you can acquire at a bargain price. Excessive Spending Destroys! Feds Have a Spending Problem — DO NOT RAISE THE CEILING! Feds Have a Sewage Problem! DEBT PERSPECTIVE! Social Security (SS) monies flow into the Feds via paycheck withholding. The Feds buy US Treasuries and the Bond purchase money is deposited into the treasury. Benefit money must therefore be paid out of the Treasury. If there had been a SS brokerage account (instead of the Feds spending it), the monies could have been invested very conservatively to receive a modest 5-8% annual return on investment and the SS "Trust" Fund would be solvent even with retiring baby-boomers. Another mismanagement failure is SS Disability which has been defrauded by mendacious citizen malingerers especially from 2000 to 2016.

CONVENTION of STATES

BECOME a MEMBER-PARTICIPANT of CONVENTION of STATES here. Get into the Action; Get information. Join here.

Joseph Story, Supreme Court Justice
... when the court wasn't part of the L-E-J Cabal

Joseph Story (1779�1845) was born during the American Revolution, and came of age in the early years of the new United States of America. He was a scholar of the U.S. Constitution, and, eventually helped found the Harvard Law School.

In 1811, Story was appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison � who knew a few things about the U.S. Constitution, in that he helped write it. Story was a contemporary of another famous member of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Marshall (1755�1835).

In 1833, Justice Story published a study titled, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. In a discussion of the Second Amendment, Story stated:

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."

See the following links for more related articles:

• The Tyranny of Economically Stifling Government Agencies which I call "Creeping Socio-Fascism" or Bob Livingston's Benevolent Totalitarianism
• Fourier Socialism
• Unions Control Governments at All Levels
• Senate Bill 391 & H.R. 612: National Right to Work Act
• Unaccountable Union Make-work Job Failure
• Rand Paul's National Right to Work Petition
• STOP Obama's out-of-control NLRB
• The Perpetrators of Failure
• The Failure of Central Banking
• Free Market Destruction
• Karl Marx Has Achieved His Goal
• Ron Paul: Blame the FED
• Central Bank Failure
• Return the World to Stability
• Gold Standard Now!
• Strongest Banks Are NOT in the U.S.
• Singapore Bank told Uncle Sam (the thief) to 'Stick It!'

[Editor's Note: what I have dubbed the "Legislative-Executive-Judicial Cabal" which the American People have caused by ignoring the generational transition from our Constitutional Republic to what now is, in effect, an "elected" dictatorship. Never mind who is elected. Never mind which bogus party is in power. The superficial, theatrically staged, choreographed appearance of debate, disagreement, and stalled legislation always resolves into more government and less FREEDOM. We the People still lose more freedom after every "emergency" or unnoticeably when CON-gress passes another general, open-ended law that enables the Executive (dictator) and its unaccountable agencies to formulate more freedom-restricting regulations (200 pages a day get posted to the Federal Register). The "Dictator's" agencies (police force) continue to pile-up more weapons to squelch uprising(s) when the People finally realize and understand their tyrannical government.

FROM Project to RESTORE AMERICA

The FairTax is a consumption tax unilaterally applied to all Americans at the same rate. For businesses, payroll taxes would no longer exist. Our exports would include a heavy tax for overseas buyers purchasing our products, while our imports would be cheaper for us to purchase. I'm not sure how this would affect GDP, as more information is necessary.

According to the FairTax website, "Under the FairTax, every person living in the United States pays a sales tax on purchases of new goods and services, excluding necessities due to the prebate." The prebate gives every legal resident household an "advance refund" at the beginning of each month so that purchases made up to the poverty level are tax-free.

So a family of four making something like $50,000/year should not have to pay taxes, thus preventing an unfair burden on low-income families. Since the FairTax eliminates both federal and payroll taxes, you get to keep your gross pay amount of each paycheck earned.

Why Do We Need Term Limits?

John Adams said, �Without [term limits] every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey�. That being said, here are some of the reasons we believe our country needs Term Limits.

1. Term Limits can help break the cycle of corruption in Congress. Case studies show that the longer an individual stays in office, the more likely they are to stop serving the public and begin serving their own interests.
2. Term Limits will encourage regular citizens to run for office. Presently, there is a 94% re-election rate in the House and 83% in the Senate. Because of name recognition, and usually the advantage of money, it can be easy to stay in office. Without legitimate competition, what is the incentive for a member of Congress to serve the public? Furthermore, it is almost a lost cause for the average citizen to try to campaign against current members of Congress.
3. Term Limits will break the power special interest groups have in Congress.
4. Term Limits will force politicians to think about the impact of their legislation because they will be returning to their communities shortly to live under the laws they enacted.
5. Term Limits will bring diversity of people and fresh ideas to Congress.

Term limits for lawmakers: when is enough, enough?

[Editor's Note: If you want to get rich, i.e. advance from a low paying government bureaucrat job on the local or state level, THEN GET ELECTED TO THE US CONGRESS (House or Senate). Once you're elected, it's easy to steal from your campaign contributions or the Congressional budget allocated to your seat and staff. You can go on a government-funded junket with 'lavishly' paid expenses. The list of ways to steal from the government while in office is inexhaustible. There are only a few Congressmen who left Congress just wealthy instead of a multi-millionaire. Of course, there are several who arrived in Congress as multi-millionaires and don't need to steal from the government.]